Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Rep. Jerry Nadler ripped final argument away from ...":
Kayla Gowdy: Dems' 10 biggest lies in Trump's Senate impeachment trial
Americans know the Democrats' plan to impeach President Trump did not begin in September 2019. Rather, as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., admitted herself, it has been going on for over two and a half years.
Unable to wrap their head around the idea that 60 million Americans disagreed with the socialist agenda propagated by the Democratic Party, Rep Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and Rep Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., and many others began their plan to impeach President Trump the moment he was elected.
This entire impeachment sham has been a predetermined narrative full of lies and false accusations designed to divide America and harm President Trump.
It's time to correct the record on Congressional Democrats' ten most egregious impeachment lies.
Lie: This impeachment process began after an anonymous whistleblower filed a complaint through the proper channels within the Office of the Inspector General.
Fact: An article published on Oct 2, 2019, by the New York Times proved Schiff received an early account of the whistleblower's complaint despite his persistent denial. This gave Democrats time to come up with an impeachment plan before any information was released to the public.
Lie: Democrats began the impeachment hearings out of concern for the country and the Constitution.
Fact: Time and time again Democrats have gone on the record proving their motivations for impeachment to be political.
Rep. Al Green, D-Texas: "I'm concerned if we don't impeach this President, he will get reelected."
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortes, D-N.Y.: "[Impeaching Trump] is about preventing a potentially disastrous outcome [in 2020]."
Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif.: "The president's misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot box."
Lie: President Trump during a phone call with Ukranian President Zelensky asked for a personal favor.
Fact: Despite consistent false statements from Democratic Congressmen and members of the media, the released transcript of the call proved President Trump said, "I want you to do us a favor." The "us" refers to America, not his political campaign.
Key Senate Republican comes out against impeachment witnesses, paving way for Trump's acquittalVideo
Lie: President Trump's unprecedented withholding of aid endangered the United States and Ukraine.
Fact: Not only did Ukraine receive its aid on time and in its entirety, but President Trump actually resumed granting foreign aid after President Obama ended the practice.
Lie: President Zelensky felt pressure from President Trump to investigate the Bidens.
Fact: President Zelensky addressed the issue with the American press, stating the call was "normal" and "nobody pushed" him to do anything for the aid.
Lie: House impeachment witnesses are first-hand evidence of a quid pro quo.
Fact: Of the impeachment witnesses brought by House Democrats, Gordon Sondland was the only one who spoke directly with President Trump regarding aid to Ukraine. He was clear the president told him, "I want nothing. I want no quid pro quo."
Lie: The whistleblower is non-partisan and can be completely trusted.
Fact: The Intelligence Inspector General found the whistleblower has "arguable political bias" against Trump and was not a primary source to the conversation, giving him no credible knowledge of the situation.
Lie: There was an urgent need for impeachment.
Fact: After saying for months that impeaching President Trump was an urgent matter, Pelosi refused to send the articles to the Senate, unnecessarily delaying the trial.
It's clear Democrats have one goal with the impeachment proceedings: denying Americans their Constitutionally elected president by overturning the results of the 2016 election. It's a disgrace just how low they are willing to go to belittle President Trump and his supporters. Their deliberate lies must be exposed.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 31, 2020 at 10:39 AM
Friday, January 31, 2020
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Joe Biden opposed additional witnesses during the ....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Joe Biden opposed additional witnesses during the ...":
Trump trolls Democrats with rowdy Des Moines rally
President Trump spoke to Fox News in an exclusive interview Thursday evening from Iowa where he said he'd had a little time to watch the impeachment proceedings despite his lively campaign rally in Des Moines.
"It's very boring to watch, I have to say that. It's very boring. I call it the impeachment hoax," Trump told reporter Peter Doocy. "It should have never taken place."
Trump added that he has "great confidence in Republican Senators and probably some Democrats" that he would be acquited.
"It's a ridiculous, partisan situation…I know they're going to be fair," he said of Republicans.
Asked if he had any concern about being one of just three U.S. presidents to be impeached, Trump maintained he "shouldn't be in this position," claiming that he has done more in his first three years in office than any other president, specifically mentioning tax and regulation cuts, fighting terrorism and rebuilding the military.
The president also dismissed claims that impeachment could stain him in Iowa or in the election. "I'm leading everybody and in Iowa, I'm leading them by a lot – every single Democrat," he told Doocy. "Iowa's doing better than they've ever done and now they're really going to start to do well because of the new trade deals that we have."
"Now the farmers are going to do fantastically well. I say they have to go out and buy bigger tractors and more land," he said.
Trump added that any polls showing Joe Biden beating him in Iowa and "old," adding, "We're beating them all and Joe's going down, I guess Bernie's surging."
Still, he said he didn't know which Democrat would win Iowa.
Trump also disputed claims made by Sanders that he would strip Medicare from participants.
"I'm the one that saved it," Trump said. He added that he hadn't touched Medicare in four years except to make it stronger. "Our country being strong is what's saving Social Security," Trump said, saying Democrats would be the ones to destroy it with their "crazy plans."
"Not only Social Security, they're going destroy health care," he said.
Doocy asked if former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has been running negative presidential campaign ads against Trump, gets under his skin.
"Who gets under my skin?" Trump shrugged. "You know how many times I've been asked that question? Like everybody that runs they say, "is it true that he's under your skin?'"
Trump added that Bloomberg's poll numbers are bad despite the amount of money he's spending on ads.
Bloomberg is skipping the early states because of his late entry in the race and is reportedly focusing on the Super Tuesday states.
Asked about coronavirus, a fast-spreading virus that has infected more than 9,000 patients in China and killed more than 200 as of Thursday, Trump said the U.S. is working "very closely" with China and other countries.
"China's not in great shape right now unfortunately but they're working very hard, we'll see what happens," he said, adding they would be making some coronavirus-related announcements within the next 48 hours.
Six patients have been diagnosed in the U.S. so far: two in Illinois, two in California, one in Washington State and one in Arizona.
On a lighter note, Trump said he hoped it would be a "great Super Bowl" on Sunday and he had a feeling who might come out on top, but chose to keep that to himself.
"I better not do that," he laughed.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 31, 2020 at 1:45 AM
Trump trolls Democrats with rowdy Des Moines rally
President Trump spoke to Fox News in an exclusive interview Thursday evening from Iowa where he said he'd had a little time to watch the impeachment proceedings despite his lively campaign rally in Des Moines.
"It's very boring to watch, I have to say that. It's very boring. I call it the impeachment hoax," Trump told reporter Peter Doocy. "It should have never taken place."
Trump added that he has "great confidence in Republican Senators and probably some Democrats" that he would be acquited.
"It's a ridiculous, partisan situation…I know they're going to be fair," he said of Republicans.
Asked if he had any concern about being one of just three U.S. presidents to be impeached, Trump maintained he "shouldn't be in this position," claiming that he has done more in his first three years in office than any other president, specifically mentioning tax and regulation cuts, fighting terrorism and rebuilding the military.
The president also dismissed claims that impeachment could stain him in Iowa or in the election. "I'm leading everybody and in Iowa, I'm leading them by a lot – every single Democrat," he told Doocy. "Iowa's doing better than they've ever done and now they're really going to start to do well because of the new trade deals that we have."
"Now the farmers are going to do fantastically well. I say they have to go out and buy bigger tractors and more land," he said.
Trump added that any polls showing Joe Biden beating him in Iowa and "old," adding, "We're beating them all and Joe's going down, I guess Bernie's surging."
Still, he said he didn't know which Democrat would win Iowa.
Trump also disputed claims made by Sanders that he would strip Medicare from participants.
"I'm the one that saved it," Trump said. He added that he hadn't touched Medicare in four years except to make it stronger. "Our country being strong is what's saving Social Security," Trump said, saying Democrats would be the ones to destroy it with their "crazy plans."
"Not only Social Security, they're going destroy health care," he said.
Doocy asked if former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who has been running negative presidential campaign ads against Trump, gets under his skin.
"Who gets under my skin?" Trump shrugged. "You know how many times I've been asked that question? Like everybody that runs they say, "is it true that he's under your skin?'"
Trump added that Bloomberg's poll numbers are bad despite the amount of money he's spending on ads.
Bloomberg is skipping the early states because of his late entry in the race and is reportedly focusing on the Super Tuesday states.
Asked about coronavirus, a fast-spreading virus that has infected more than 9,000 patients in China and killed more than 200 as of Thursday, Trump said the U.S. is working "very closely" with China and other countries.
"China's not in great shape right now unfortunately but they're working very hard, we'll see what happens," he said, adding they would be making some coronavirus-related announcements within the next 48 hours.
Six patients have been diagnosed in the U.S. so far: two in Illinois, two in California, one in Washington State and one in Arizona.
On a lighter note, Trump said he hoped it would be a "great Super Bowl" on Sunday and he had a feeling who might come out on top, but chose to keep that to himself.
"I better not do that," he laughed.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 31, 2020 at 1:45 AM
Thursday, January 30, 2020
[Erin Burnett] New comment on UNBELIEVABLE: Chief Justice John Roberts declines ....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "UNBELIEVABLE: Chief Justice John Roberts declines ...":
John Roberts publicly rejects Rand Paul's whistleblower question in Senate impeachment trial
Chief Justice John Roberts on Thursday publicly refused to read a question from Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky during the Senate impeachment trial that named the alleged Ukraine whistleblower.
"The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted," Roberts said after receiving the question card.
Paul had expressed frustration with Republican leadership during the trial Wednesday night after it was made clear Roberts would not read his question that named the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, sources with knowledge of the situation said.
The development brought Roberts into an unusual position in the trial, where he has served in large part to guide the proceedings, not to decide or make any rulings on how they progress.
But prior to the 16-hour question-and-answer period for the trial on Wednesday, Roberts made clear that he would not read the alleged name of the whistleblower, nor would he consider questions that would move to clearly identify the individual, the sources said. Roberts, in his role, reads each question submitted by senators.
He was able to review questions from senators who submitted them prior to the start of Wednesday's proceedings, according to two sources. Paul's question, which sources said was revised several times but explicitly would have named the alleged whistleblower, ran afoul of the line Roberts drew on the matter.
Paul, for his part, could be seen and overheard expressing his frustration on the Senate floor during a break in the proceedings. "If I have to fight for recognition, I will," he was heard telling a Republican staffer.
The dispute created a behind-the-scenes issue that Republican leaders were attempting to resolve, though no solution had been reached by Wednesday evening.
Paul said during a break during Wednesday night's proceedings that "it's still an ongoing process" and the question "may happen tomorrow."
There have been several other whistleblower questions, some that even included identifying information, which Roberts has read. It's the alleged name itself that is his red line, sources said.
The disputed question -- an unprecedented situation -- comes on the first day senators have had a chance to be heard in the impeachment trial by submitting questions to be read aloud by Roberts directed at one or both of the legal teams. While several Republicans have called for the whistleblower's identity to be revealed in the past, Paul's attempted question on the Senate floor marks the most notable escalation to date.
The question falls in line with President Donald Trump's own repeated calls for news organizations to identify the whistleblower.
"There have been stories written about a certain individual, a male, and they say he's the whistleblower," Trump said in November, referring to reports in conservative media outlets purporting to identify the author. "If he's the whistleblower, he has no credibility. Because he's a Brennan guy, he's a Susan Rice guy, he's an Obama guy. And he hates Trump."
Days after the whistleblower complaint had been released publicly last September, Trump tweeted that he deserved to "meet my accuser."
"Like every American, I deserve to meet my accuser, especially when this accuser, the so-called 'Whistleblower,' represented a perfect conversation with a foreign leader in a totally inaccurate and fraudulent way," he said.
Roberts' refusal to read Paul's question also marks a rare moment of meaningful authority as he presides over the trial -- a position that is highly public but has largely seen him recite procedural rules, keep the clock and read aloud vote tallies.
The chief justice has long been known for his extensive preparation and an ability to foresee what's ahead, which some colleagues have likened to three-dimensional chess.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 12:15 PM
John Roberts publicly rejects Rand Paul's whistleblower question in Senate impeachment trial
Chief Justice John Roberts on Thursday publicly refused to read a question from Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky during the Senate impeachment trial that named the alleged Ukraine whistleblower.
"The presiding officer declines to read the question as submitted," Roberts said after receiving the question card.
Paul had expressed frustration with Republican leadership during the trial Wednesday night after it was made clear Roberts would not read his question that named the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, sources with knowledge of the situation said.
The development brought Roberts into an unusual position in the trial, where he has served in large part to guide the proceedings, not to decide or make any rulings on how they progress.
But prior to the 16-hour question-and-answer period for the trial on Wednesday, Roberts made clear that he would not read the alleged name of the whistleblower, nor would he consider questions that would move to clearly identify the individual, the sources said. Roberts, in his role, reads each question submitted by senators.
He was able to review questions from senators who submitted them prior to the start of Wednesday's proceedings, according to two sources. Paul's question, which sources said was revised several times but explicitly would have named the alleged whistleblower, ran afoul of the line Roberts drew on the matter.
Paul, for his part, could be seen and overheard expressing his frustration on the Senate floor during a break in the proceedings. "If I have to fight for recognition, I will," he was heard telling a Republican staffer.
The dispute created a behind-the-scenes issue that Republican leaders were attempting to resolve, though no solution had been reached by Wednesday evening.
Paul said during a break during Wednesday night's proceedings that "it's still an ongoing process" and the question "may happen tomorrow."
There have been several other whistleblower questions, some that even included identifying information, which Roberts has read. It's the alleged name itself that is his red line, sources said.
The disputed question -- an unprecedented situation -- comes on the first day senators have had a chance to be heard in the impeachment trial by submitting questions to be read aloud by Roberts directed at one or both of the legal teams. While several Republicans have called for the whistleblower's identity to be revealed in the past, Paul's attempted question on the Senate floor marks the most notable escalation to date.
The question falls in line with President Donald Trump's own repeated calls for news organizations to identify the whistleblower.
"There have been stories written about a certain individual, a male, and they say he's the whistleblower," Trump said in November, referring to reports in conservative media outlets purporting to identify the author. "If he's the whistleblower, he has no credibility. Because he's a Brennan guy, he's a Susan Rice guy, he's an Obama guy. And he hates Trump."
Days after the whistleblower complaint had been released publicly last September, Trump tweeted that he deserved to "meet my accuser."
"Like every American, I deserve to meet my accuser, especially when this accuser, the so-called 'Whistleblower,' represented a perfect conversation with a foreign leader in a totally inaccurate and fraudulent way," he said.
Roberts' refusal to read Paul's question also marks a rare moment of meaningful authority as he presides over the trial -- a position that is highly public but has largely seen him recite procedural rules, keep the clock and read aloud vote tallies.
The chief justice has long been known for his extensive preparation and an ability to foresee what's ahead, which some colleagues have likened to three-dimensional chess.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 12:15 PM
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Alan Dershowitz slammed present-day scholars for c....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Alan Dershowitz slammed present-day scholars for c...":
University of Michigan law professor Barbara McQuade called Dershowitz's logic "absurd" and said, "If the Senate is to maintain any semblance of a check on presidential abuse, surely it must reject this argument."
Former White House counsel John Dean said that by Dershowitz's logic former President Richard Nixon would not have been subject to impeachment for the Watergate break-in. But Dershowitz, who has argued impeachment requires a criminal act, did say "the only thing that would make a quid pro quo unlawful is if the quo were, in some way, illegal."
"Alan Dershowitz unimpeached Richard Nixon today. All Nixon was doing was obstructing justice and abusing power because he thought he was the best person for the USA to be POTUS," Dean said in a tweet.
Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, also invoked Nixon in a tweet criticizing Dershowitz.
"Richard Nixon once made this argument: 'When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.' He was forced to resign in disgrace. In America, no one is above the law," she said.
Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., told MSNBC Dershowitz's claim "sounds like something coming out of North Korea, not Pennsylvania Avenue."
"Dear @CongressEthics: Can I have my staff pressure a foreign government to help my re-election campaign because it's in the public interest that I get re-elected? Just kidding," quipped Rep, Ted Lieu, D-Calif. "Unlike @realDonaldTrump & crazy @AlanDersh, I follow federal law."
Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., defended Dershowitz and said the "the left," and some members of the news media, "blatantly misconstrue" his argument.
"He's never argued that the POTUS has absolute immunity," Biggs said in a tweet. "He's challenging the amorphous charge of Abuse of Power. Huge difference."
The second of the two days scheduled for questions and answers in the Senate impeachment trial opens Thursday afternoon.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 9:43 AM
University of Michigan law professor Barbara McQuade called Dershowitz's logic "absurd" and said, "If the Senate is to maintain any semblance of a check on presidential abuse, surely it must reject this argument."
Former White House counsel John Dean said that by Dershowitz's logic former President Richard Nixon would not have been subject to impeachment for the Watergate break-in. But Dershowitz, who has argued impeachment requires a criminal act, did say "the only thing that would make a quid pro quo unlawful is if the quo were, in some way, illegal."
"Alan Dershowitz unimpeached Richard Nixon today. All Nixon was doing was obstructing justice and abusing power because he thought he was the best person for the USA to be POTUS," Dean said in a tweet.
Hillary Clinton, the 2016 Democratic presidential nominee, also invoked Nixon in a tweet criticizing Dershowitz.
"Richard Nixon once made this argument: 'When the president does it, that means that it is not illegal.' He was forced to resign in disgrace. In America, no one is above the law," she said.
Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., told MSNBC Dershowitz's claim "sounds like something coming out of North Korea, not Pennsylvania Avenue."
"Dear @CongressEthics: Can I have my staff pressure a foreign government to help my re-election campaign because it's in the public interest that I get re-elected? Just kidding," quipped Rep, Ted Lieu, D-Calif. "Unlike @realDonaldTrump & crazy @AlanDersh, I follow federal law."
Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Ariz., defended Dershowitz and said the "the left," and some members of the news media, "blatantly misconstrue" his argument.
"He's never argued that the POTUS has absolute immunity," Biggs said in a tweet. "He's challenging the amorphous charge of Abuse of Power. Huge difference."
The second of the two days scheduled for questions and answers in the Senate impeachment trial opens Thursday afternoon.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 9:43 AM
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Alan Dershowitz slammed present-day scholars for c....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Alan Dershowitz slammed present-day scholars for c...":
Trump lawyer Dershowitz argues president can't be impeached for an act he thinks will help his re-election
Attorney Alan Dershowitz, a member of President Donald Trump's defense team, alarmed Democrats and many legal scholars with his argument in the first day of questions and answers in the Senate impeachment trial that presidents cannot be removed from office for an action they believe could help get them re-elected.
In response to a question from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, about whether it mattered if Trump engaged in a "quid pro quo," Dershowitz said that motive was what mattered and that if an act was in the public interest it was not impeachable. And he said it was reasonable for a public official to equate what is in their own political interest with the public good.
"Every public official that I know believes that his election is in the public interest," he said. "And if a president does something, which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment."
Dershowitz said a quid pro quo that involved an illegal act, or was done for personal financial gain, would be impeachable, however.
Amid a flood of criticism on social media and cable news, the high-profile attorney and law professor said his answer was being "willfully distorted."
"They characterized my argument as if I had said that if a president believes that his re-election was in the national interest, he can do anything. I said nothing like that, as anyone who actually heard what I said can attest," he said in a tweet.
Trump is facing two articles of impeachment, one for abuse of power and one for obstruction of Congress, stemming for allegations he leveraged military aid to Ukraine in a "quid pro quo" – a Latin phrase for a deal in which something is given and received –with Ukraine for assistance with politically motivated investigations.
Dershowitz went on to say it was "dangerous" to base an impeachment on assumptions about what a president was thinking when he or she made a controversial decision because "everybody has mixed motives."
"A constitutional impeachment based on mixed motives would permit almost any president to be impeached," he argued. "How many presidents have made foreign policy decisions after checking with their political advisers and their pollsters?"
Lead House impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said it was a "very odd argument for a criminal defense lawyer to make" because motive plays a role in almost every criminal case.
Schiff said Dershowitz's logic would give a president "carte blanche" to cheat in an election.
"All quid pros are not the same. Some are legitimate and some are corrupt. And you don't need to be a mind reader to figure out which is which," Schiff said.
On Twitter, Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe, a longtime critic of both Trump and Dershowitz, compared the argument to French King Louis XIV's declaration, "L'état, c'est moi," meaning, "I am the state."
"Accepting this argument would put us on a short path toward dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise. It's incompatible with the government of, by, and for the people. It's government by egomania," Tribe said.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 9:43 AM
Trump lawyer Dershowitz argues president can't be impeached for an act he thinks will help his re-election
Attorney Alan Dershowitz, a member of President Donald Trump's defense team, alarmed Democrats and many legal scholars with his argument in the first day of questions and answers in the Senate impeachment trial that presidents cannot be removed from office for an action they believe could help get them re-elected.
In response to a question from Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, about whether it mattered if Trump engaged in a "quid pro quo," Dershowitz said that motive was what mattered and that if an act was in the public interest it was not impeachable. And he said it was reasonable for a public official to equate what is in their own political interest with the public good.
"Every public official that I know believes that his election is in the public interest," he said. "And if a president does something, which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment."
Dershowitz said a quid pro quo that involved an illegal act, or was done for personal financial gain, would be impeachable, however.
Amid a flood of criticism on social media and cable news, the high-profile attorney and law professor said his answer was being "willfully distorted."
"They characterized my argument as if I had said that if a president believes that his re-election was in the national interest, he can do anything. I said nothing like that, as anyone who actually heard what I said can attest," he said in a tweet.
Trump is facing two articles of impeachment, one for abuse of power and one for obstruction of Congress, stemming for allegations he leveraged military aid to Ukraine in a "quid pro quo" – a Latin phrase for a deal in which something is given and received –with Ukraine for assistance with politically motivated investigations.
Dershowitz went on to say it was "dangerous" to base an impeachment on assumptions about what a president was thinking when he or she made a controversial decision because "everybody has mixed motives."
"A constitutional impeachment based on mixed motives would permit almost any president to be impeached," he argued. "How many presidents have made foreign policy decisions after checking with their political advisers and their pollsters?"
Lead House impeachment manager Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., said it was a "very odd argument for a criminal defense lawyer to make" because motive plays a role in almost every criminal case.
Schiff said Dershowitz's logic would give a president "carte blanche" to cheat in an election.
"All quid pros are not the same. Some are legitimate and some are corrupt. And you don't need to be a mind reader to figure out which is which," Schiff said.
On Twitter, Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe, a longtime critic of both Trump and Dershowitz, compared the argument to French King Louis XIV's declaration, "L'état, c'est moi," meaning, "I am the state."
"Accepting this argument would put us on a short path toward dictatorship, benevolent or otherwise. It's incompatible with the government of, by, and for the people. It's government by egomania," Tribe said.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 9:43 AM
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Alan Dershowitz slammed present-day scholars for c....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Alan Dershowitz slammed present-day scholars for c...":
Instead, the House of Representatives accused President Trump of "abuse of power" because "to obtain an improper personal political benefit" he ignored "national security and other vital national interests."
But by this standard, every President, whether Republican or Democrat, is impeachable. Abuse of power is a cliché accusation that politicians routinely toss at each other.
Here, the alleged abuse of power is that President Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate corruption and election meddling as a quid pro quo for timely receiving certain military assistance from the U.S. government. That is why Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, asked Prof. Dershowitz, "As a matter of law, does it matter if there was a quid pro quo?"
Of course, it is self-evidently in the public interest for voters to know about corruption and election meddling. But the "personal political benefit" to President Trump under this quid pro quo is that it would reduce voters' support for Democrats if voters saw that Ukraine meddled in the U.S. presidential election to help Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, and also if voters saw that Vice President Joe Biden enjoyed a conflict of interest when his son, Hunter Biden, was paid a fortune to sit on the board of a politically-connected Ukrainian energy company while Vice President Biden oversaw Ukraine policy.
Whether there was a quid pro quo or not, elections can remedy or ratify such alleged abuses of power. The decision belongs to voters: not to legislative factions and certainly not to unelected bureaucrats.
To be sure, voters elected both the President and the legislative faction that is trying to remove him.
That is why fidelity to the law matters. The law of high crimes and misdemeanors is the constitutional tiebreaker that resolves this impasse between the duly-elected House of Representatives and the duly-elected President.
And the 2020 election is the tiebreaker that will resolve whether the President and his opponents each remain in office for the following term.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 9:37 AM
Instead, the House of Representatives accused President Trump of "abuse of power" because "to obtain an improper personal political benefit" he ignored "national security and other vital national interests."
But by this standard, every President, whether Republican or Democrat, is impeachable. Abuse of power is a cliché accusation that politicians routinely toss at each other.
Here, the alleged abuse of power is that President Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate corruption and election meddling as a quid pro quo for timely receiving certain military assistance from the U.S. government. That is why Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, asked Prof. Dershowitz, "As a matter of law, does it matter if there was a quid pro quo?"
Of course, it is self-evidently in the public interest for voters to know about corruption and election meddling. But the "personal political benefit" to President Trump under this quid pro quo is that it would reduce voters' support for Democrats if voters saw that Ukraine meddled in the U.S. presidential election to help Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton, and also if voters saw that Vice President Joe Biden enjoyed a conflict of interest when his son, Hunter Biden, was paid a fortune to sit on the board of a politically-connected Ukrainian energy company while Vice President Biden oversaw Ukraine policy.
Whether there was a quid pro quo or not, elections can remedy or ratify such alleged abuses of power. The decision belongs to voters: not to legislative factions and certainly not to unelected bureaucrats.
To be sure, voters elected both the President and the legislative faction that is trying to remove him.
That is why fidelity to the law matters. The law of high crimes and misdemeanors is the constitutional tiebreaker that resolves this impasse between the duly-elected House of Representatives and the duly-elected President.
And the 2020 election is the tiebreaker that will resolve whether the President and his opponents each remain in office for the following term.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 9:37 AM
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Alan Dershowitz slammed present-day scholars for c....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Alan Dershowitz slammed present-day scholars for c...":
Lew Olowski: Why Trump impeachment attorney Dershowitz is right that re-election serves the public interest
A politician's election represents the public interest for one simple reason: the public elected him.
"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment," said Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor and one of the attorneys representing President Trump at his Senate impeachment trial.
Prof. Dershowitz's comments triggered instant criticism. But Dershowitz's critics merely revealed their own ignorance about the law, the Constitution, and democracy itself.
"This is what you hear from Stalin," said CNN contributor Joe Lockhart, who served as White House press secretary under President Bill Clinton. "This is what you hear from Mussolini, what you hear from authoritarians, from Hitler, from all the authoritarian people who rationalized, in some cases genocide, based what was in the public interest."
Stalin and Hitler did not believe elections serve the public interest. They murdered their political opponents. Literally—not metaphorically in landslide elections. And genocide—unlike the impeachment articles against President Trump—is a crime.
Criminal behavior is not in the public interest. The public criminalizes it. For example, Joe Lockhart's former boss sexually exploited a 22-year old intern inside the Oval Office. Then he lied about it under oath, committing perjury: a felony crime punishable with years in prison. Consequently, he was impeached. But even under those extreme circumstances, the Senate did not expel President Bill Clinton from the White House.
Perjury, like murder, is a crime of moral turpitude. Criminal statutes generally represent the public interest because these statutes are drafted by legislators whom the public elected. The President, likewise, is elected by the public to implement such legislation and fulfill other executive functions.
Members of Congress and the president each represent their respective voters. And, in a democracy, voters are the ultimate deciders of the public interest. A politician who faithfully serves voters' interests—and wins their election—is serving the public interest.
The limit to this principle is found in criminal statutes and the Constitution. That has been Prof. Dershowitz's argument all along. Prof. Dershowitz has repeatedly emphasized that "abuse of power" is an invalid impeachment article specifically because it is an unlimited accusation. The Constitution's minimum standards for impeaching a president require "high crimes and misdemeanors" such as treason and bribery: not merely the abuse of power.
But neither of the two articles of impeachment against President Trump raises any such criminal accusation. Thus, according to Prof. Dershowitz, these articles of impeachment are constitutionally invalid. If legislators want to impeach a president while operating within the boundaries of statutory and Constitutional law, then they must allege and prove criminal misconduct at the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 9:37 AM
Lew Olowski: Why Trump impeachment attorney Dershowitz is right that re-election serves the public interest
A politician's election represents the public interest for one simple reason: the public elected him.
"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment," said Alan Dershowitz, a Harvard law professor and one of the attorneys representing President Trump at his Senate impeachment trial.
Prof. Dershowitz's comments triggered instant criticism. But Dershowitz's critics merely revealed their own ignorance about the law, the Constitution, and democracy itself.
"This is what you hear from Stalin," said CNN contributor Joe Lockhart, who served as White House press secretary under President Bill Clinton. "This is what you hear from Mussolini, what you hear from authoritarians, from Hitler, from all the authoritarian people who rationalized, in some cases genocide, based what was in the public interest."
Stalin and Hitler did not believe elections serve the public interest. They murdered their political opponents. Literally—not metaphorically in landslide elections. And genocide—unlike the impeachment articles against President Trump—is a crime.
Criminal behavior is not in the public interest. The public criminalizes it. For example, Joe Lockhart's former boss sexually exploited a 22-year old intern inside the Oval Office. Then he lied about it under oath, committing perjury: a felony crime punishable with years in prison. Consequently, he was impeached. But even under those extreme circumstances, the Senate did not expel President Bill Clinton from the White House.
Perjury, like murder, is a crime of moral turpitude. Criminal statutes generally represent the public interest because these statutes are drafted by legislators whom the public elected. The President, likewise, is elected by the public to implement such legislation and fulfill other executive functions.
Members of Congress and the president each represent their respective voters. And, in a democracy, voters are the ultimate deciders of the public interest. A politician who faithfully serves voters' interests—and wins their election—is serving the public interest.
The limit to this principle is found in criminal statutes and the Constitution. That has been Prof. Dershowitz's argument all along. Prof. Dershowitz has repeatedly emphasized that "abuse of power" is an invalid impeachment article specifically because it is an unlimited accusation. The Constitution's minimum standards for impeaching a president require "high crimes and misdemeanors" such as treason and bribery: not merely the abuse of power.
But neither of the two articles of impeachment against President Trump raises any such criminal accusation. Thus, according to Prof. Dershowitz, these articles of impeachment are constitutionally invalid. If legislators want to impeach a president while operating within the boundaries of statutory and Constitutional law, then they must allege and prove criminal misconduct at the level of high crimes and misdemeanors.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 30, 2020 at 9:37 AM
How to exchange Ethereum to USD Trusted Platform
Ethereum exchanger is one of the leading cryptocurrency exchanges, providing instant solutions to the problem of how to exchange Ethereum to USD in a trusted way. Clients can buy Ethereum with debit or credit cards. VISA, Mastercard, and other related brands, including prepaid cards. The following assets are also available for purchase: Ethereum, Litecoin, Ripple, EtherCash, and Ethereum Classic. One of the most significant advantages is the ability to pay for crypto using a variety of currencies, including, but not limited to, USD, GBP, and EUR. Unlike most other exchanges, we don't hold customer deposits. Like this, your funds don't suffer custodial risk. No registration, no email, no identification documents needed, only your crypto public address or otherwise you can also use your Ethereum wallet account. When Ethereum founder created Ethereum, he not only wanted to create a financial system without third-party intermediaries, but he also wanted to allow people to send and receive funds anonymously. Ethereumsxchanger is an anonymous Ethereum exchange. We highly recommend the Ethereumsxchanger site, if you are looking for a transaction without the stringent KYC verification. These accounts are perfect for casual investors looking to own a small amount of cryptocurrency.
With this Ethereum exchange, you can withdraw any amount of coins with the unverified account; all you need is an email address. This platform guarantees your anonymity with complete security. You can instantly exchange and make money with ethereum. Coinbase is one of the largest and most well-known exchanges in the industry, and one of the best platforms for beginners to use when they are first starting with Ethereum. You need to follow simple steps in finding an answer to how to withdraw Ethereums from Coinbase. Still, many new users may have difficulty figuring out how to send their Ethereum from Coinbase to other wallets or different exchanges. You need to create an account and mention the specific payment mode with its destination address. And here, you will easily withdraw your Ethereums from the Coinsbase and check ethereum price coinbase USD in a quick way. To initiate the process of how to cash out on the Coinbase platform. The users need a basic Coinbase account. At this account, they will get many options for wallets. Of course, you will go for a ETH wallet to cash out your coins. The transfer itself is only a two-minute process and is very easy to conduct.
Therefore, you can expect to see your funds in your wallet. The whole process is as quick as minutes after you send them or as late as hours after your transfer. This cashing out depends upon the speed of the network, ethereum investment trust and this could be either a slow or fast process. By far, the most popular way to convert Ethereums into USD is through centralized exchanges such as Ethereum exchanger. With its sleek user interfaces and KYC (Know Your Customer) processes, this exchange will let you link your funding bank account for withdrawal, making the process easy and painless. The users here enter the amount of USD that they want to turn to USD. When you enter this amount of USD, Coinbase will automatically calculate the amount of ETH it would cost to get that corresponding amount of USD. If you don't have the largest amount of Ethereum in your wallet, Ethereum exchanger will notify you and tell you to enter a new amount.
How to invest in ethereum price chart live
This Ethereum platform is one of the main cryptographic money trades, giving moment answers for the issue of how to trade Ethereum in a confided in way see ethereum price chart live on this site. Customers can purchase Ethereum with charge or Visas. VISA, Mastercard, and other related brands, including prepaid cards. The accompanying resources are likewise accessible for procurement: Ethereum, Litecoin, Ripple, EtherCash, and Ethereum Classic. One of the most huge favorable circumstances is the capacity to pay for crypto utilizing an assortment of monetary standards, including, yet not restricted to, USD, GBP, and EUR. In contrast to most different trades, we don't hold client stores. Like this, your assets don't endure custodial hazard. No enlistment, no email, no distinguishing proof archives required, just your crypto open location and get to know how to invest in ethereum. When Ethereum originator made Ethereum, he not just needed to make a money related framework without outsider go-betweens, however he additionally needed to permit individuals to send and get reserves namelessly.
Ethereum exchange site is an unknown Ethereum trade. We strongly suggest the Ethereumsxchanger site, on the off chance that you are searching for an exchange without the stringent KYC check. These records are ideal for easygoing financial specialists hoping to possess a limited quantity of digital money. With Ethereum exchanger, you can pull back any measure of coins with the unsubstantiated record; all you need is an email address. This stage ensures your secrecy of ethereum real time price with complete security. You can quickly trade your Ethereums. This is one of the biggest and most notable trades in the business, and perhaps the best stage for fledglings to utilize when they are first beginning with Ethereum.
You have to follow basic strides in finding a response to how to pull back Ethereums from Coinbase. All things considered, numerous new clients may experience issues making sense of how to send their Ethereum from Coinbase to different wallets or various trades. You have to make a record and notice the particular installment mode with its goal address to exchange Eth to USD. Also, here, you will effortlessly pull back your Ethereums from the coinsbase site in a brisk manner. To start the procedure of how to money out on the Coinbase stage. The clients need a fundamental Coinbase account. At this record, they will get numerous alternatives for wallets. Obviously, you will go for an ETH wallet to money out your coins. The exchange itself is just a two-minute procedure and is anything but difficult to direct. In this way, you can hope to see your assets in your wallet. The entire procedure is as snappy as minutes after you send them to localethereum wallet or as late as hours after your exchange. This getting the money for out relies on the speed of the system, and this could be either a slow or quick procedure. By a long shot, the most well known approach to change over Ethereums into USD is through unified trades, for example, Ethereum trade.
With its smooth UIs and KYC (Know Your Customer) forms, this trade will let you connect your financing ledger for withdrawal, making the procedure simple and effortless. The clients here enter the measure of USD that they need to go to USD. At the point when you enter future price of ethereum classic this measure of USD, Coinbase will consequently compute the measure of ETH it would cost to get that relating measure of USD. On the off chance that you don't have the measure of Ethereum in your wallet, Ethereums exchanger will inform you and guide you to enter another sum.
Wednesday, January 29, 2020
Bitcoin to Local Currency Conversion - How to send Cryptocurrency
Bitcoin to local currency conversion is a common way to exchange cryptocurrencies on the market. However, in reality, relatively few companies and individuals accept payments in Bitcoin. This is one of the reasons for converting BTC to cash. Therefore, you can buy the real thing using the value of Bitcoin. Another common reason to exchange BTC for a bank account is to withdraw cash from Bitcoin when the market is falling. Bitcoinsxchanger is the exclusive place where bitcoins pay exchanges. In this regard, you can rely entirely on your own exchange service. If you want to transfer bitcoin to your PayPal account, you will receive bitcoin coinbase and you want to know how to withdraw your balance because your friend sent you cash or paid customers with PayPal. To get PayPal cash, you can transfer it to a bank account or withdraw money from an ATM using a linked debit card. Bitcoinsxchanger provides an excellent service for transferring bitcoins to your PayPal account. It is imperative to check in advance the rate of the required service, especially if you need to convert Bitcoin from one currency to another. Bitcoin is the world's leading cryptocurrency, and PayPal is famous for online payments. So, if you have problems with how to send cryptocurrency from revolut, you need to understand one thing. There is no relationship between BTC and PayPal, but both are interconnected. Bitcoinsxchanger offers Bitcoin to Payoneer Exchange, which is also an online payment solution, and Western Union is also an extensive network of payment solutions, so there are many options to exchange bitcoinsxchanger. Some people prefer PayPal over all other online payment solutions. The reason is that PayPal offers the best service and the largest network in the world.
There are several ways to send Bitcoin to PayPal. Bitcoin acts as a digital cash. And like cash, bitcoins are almost impossible to track. Exchange rate bitcoin to us dollar services such as Paypal create a problem because there is no official record of the person receiving the purchased Bitcoin. Open the door to all kinds of fraud and legal difficulties. But here, the Bitcoinsxchanger platform allows you to easily send bitcoins to your PayPal account. There are no hidden charges on our site for our services. The whole system is very clear, since transactions are always fair. We provide fast and reliable exchange service. The payment method or transfer process of selling Bitcoin to Paypal is very simple. Usually, people buy products online via the web, and each online store bitcoin on ledger nano s allows payment via PayPal. These are the reasons for choosing PayPal. Like Bitcoin, PayPal is also the world's most famous and most eligible cryptocurrency. Bitcoin rates are 100 times faster than other ciphers. As a result, it is becoming increasingly popular for providing fast and easy service. Bitcoinsxchanger offers the most famous and demanding payment options, such as sending bitcoin to PayPal for customers. This service is more demanding in today's crypto world.
Exchange Bitcoin Bkash with paypal and TradeBitcoin
Exchange bitcoin to bkash with paypal account is a typical method for trading cryptographic forms of money in the market. In any case, actually moderately barely any organizations or people will acknowledge installment in bitcoin. That is one explanation you might need to change over your BTC to money — with the goal that you can utilize the estimation of your bitcoin to purchase genuine articles. Another basic purpose behind trading BTC to a ledger is to money out of bitcoin on occasion when the market is in decrease. Bitcoinsxchanger is a selective spot for bitcoin to pay trade. You can believe its remarkable trade benefits right now. Here, you can also see how to earn bitcoin in Bangladesh. In the event that you need to move bitcoin to PayPal account, possibly in light of the fact that a companion sent you some money, or an independent customer paid utilizing PayPal, you'll need to realize how to pull back the equalization.
To get your hands on your PayPal money, you can either move it to a ledger or utilize a connected plastic to pull back cash from an ATM. Bitcoinsxchanger serves magnificent administrations to move bitcoins to a PayPal account. It's fundamental to watch that the charges for the administrations you need ahead of time — particularly in the event that you have to change over your bitcoins starting with one money then onto the next. Bitcoin is the top digital money of the world, while PayPal is notable for online installments. How to get bitcoin check all info about this. So when the issue emerges of how to move bitcoins to PayPal, you have to comprehend a certain something. There is no connection among BTC and PayPal, however these are both interconnected with one another. There are numerous choices to trade bitcoin-like Bitcoinsxchanger is offering bitcoin to Payoneer trade, which is likewise an online installment arrangement, and western association is additionally a broad system giving installment arrangements. Individuals incline toward PayPal to all other online installment arrangements. The explanation is PayPal is offering the best administrations and the world's biggest system. How to trade cryptocurrency is also a important thing to know. There are a few different ways to send bitcoins to PayPal. Bitcoin capacities like computerized money. Also, similar to money, Bitcoin is as a rule untraceable. It represents an issue for an assistance like Paypal in light of the fact that there is no open record of somebody accepting Bitcoin that they purchase. It opens the entryway for a wide range of tricks and legitimate challenges.
In any case, here at the Bitcoinsxchanger stage, you can undoubtedly send bitcoins to PayPal account. There are definitely no shrouded charges at our site for our administrations. Our entire framework is completely clear, as we are in every case reasonable in our dealings. We offer moment and solid trade administrations. So, start trading bitcoin for profit right now. The installment technique or move procedure to sell Bitcoin to Paypal is very basic. Individuals use to purchase the item online through the web, and each online store permits installments through PayPal. These are the motivations to pick PayPal. As bitcoin PayPal is additionally the world's generally acclaimed and high evaluated digital money. Paces of one bitcoin are multiple times more than another crypto. So it's turning out to be increasingly more well known for giving simple and brisk administrations. We at Bitcoinsxchanger are offering the most celebrated and requested installment choices, such as sending bitcoins to PayPal for our customers. As this administration is generally requesting in the cryptocurrency market capitalization coinmarketcap world by and by.
Bitcoin to Cash Transfer Money with Paypal Account
Bitcoin to cash transfer money with paypal account is a common way of exchanging cryptocurrencies in the market. However, the reality is that relatively few businesses or individuals will accept payment in bitcoin. That is one reason you may want to convert your BTC to cash—so that you can use the value of your bitcoin to buy real things. Another common reason for exchanging BTC to a bank account is to cash out of bitcoin at times when the market is in decline. Bitcoinsxchanger is an exclusive place for bitcoin to pay exchange. You can trust its unique exchange services in this regard completely. If you want to transfer bitcoin to PayPal account, maybe because a friend sent you some cash, or a freelance client paid using PayPal, you'll want to know how to withdraw the balance. To get your hands on your PayPal cash, you can either transfer it to a bank account or use a linked debit card to withdraw money from an ATM. Bitcoinsxchanger serves excellent services to transfer bitcoins to a PayPal account. It's essential to check that the fees for the services you need in advance - especially if you need to convert your bitcoins from one currency to another. Bitcoin is the top cryptocurrency of the world, while PayPal is well known for online payments. So when the issue arises of how to transfer bitcoins to PayPal, you need to understand one thing. There is no relation between BTC and PayPal, but these are both interconnected with each other. There are many options to exchange bitcoin-like Bitcoinsxchanger is offering bitcoin to Payoneer exchange, which is also an online payment solution, and western union is also an extensive network providing payment solutions. People prefer PayPal to all other online payment solutions. The reason is PayPal is offering the best services and the world's largest network. There are several ways to send bitcoins to PayPal. Bitcoin functions like digital cash. And like cash, Bitcoin is almost entirely untraceable. It poses a problem for a service like Paypal because there is no public record of someone receiving Bitcoin that they buy. It opens the door for all kinds of scams and legal difficulties. But here at the Bitcoinsxchanger platform, you can easily send bitcoins to PayPal account. There are absolutely no hidden charges at our site for our services. Our whole system is crystal clear, as we are always fair in our dealings. We offer instant and reliable exchange services. The payment method or transfer process to sell Bitcoin to Paypal is quite simple. People use to buy the product online through the web, and each online store allows payments through PayPal. These are the reasons to choose PayPal. As bitcoin PayPal is also the world's most famous and high rated cryptocurrency. Rates of one bitcoin are 100 times more than another crypto. So it's becoming more and more popular for providing easy and quick services. We at Bitcoinsxchanger are offering the most famous and demanded payment options, like sending bitcoins to PayPal for our clients. As this service is most demanding in the crypto world presently.
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Alan Dershowitz: Democrats can't change that just ....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Alan Dershowitz: Democrats can't change that just ...":
Alan Dershowitz: Quid pro quos to help Trump get elected aren't impeachable
A lawyer for President Trump argued Wednesday that if the commander-in-chief had multiple motives for asking Ukraine to probe Joe Biden, it would not matter even if one of them would benefit him politically.
"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment," retired Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz told the Senate during the first day of the question-and-answer phase of Trump's impeachment trial.
"Every public official that I know believes that his election is in the public interest."
Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz had asked Trump's lawyers whether quid pro quos were even illegal, and whether they were standard procedure for conducting foreign policy.
Dershowitz replied that if Trump had multiple motives — including one that benefited him politically — it would still be legal.
"Everybody has mixed motives, and for there to be a constitutional impeachment based on mixed motives would permit almost any president to be impeached," he added, calling it dangerous to "psychoanalyze" Trump to determine his motives.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) then asked House managers about Dershowitz's arguments that quid pro quos are standard operating procedure in foreign policy.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-NY) said that in every trial, "the question of the defendant's intention or state of mind is always an issue," responding to Dershowitz's argument that Trump should not be psychoanalyzed to determine whether he abused his power.
Schiff also questioned Dershowitz's belief that all quid pro quos were created equal, asserting that that theory would give a president "carte blanche" to act in their personal political interest rather than the national interest.
"The next president of the United States can ask for an investigation of you. They can ask for help in their next election from any foreign power," Schiff said.
Senators began the first of two planned days of posing questions to both Trump's legal team and the House Democrats who have served as prosecutors in the trial on charges of abusing power and obstructing Congress arising from his request that Ukraine investigate political rival Biden.
The questioning began about 1 p.m. and precedes a vote later in the week on whether to call witnesses as Democrats have sought.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 8:41 PM
Alan Dershowitz: Quid pro quos to help Trump get elected aren't impeachable
A lawyer for President Trump argued Wednesday that if the commander-in-chief had multiple motives for asking Ukraine to probe Joe Biden, it would not matter even if one of them would benefit him politically.
"If a president does something which he believes will help him get elected in the public interest, that cannot be the kind of quid pro quo that results in impeachment," retired Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz told the Senate during the first day of the question-and-answer phase of Trump's impeachment trial.
"Every public official that I know believes that his election is in the public interest."
Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz had asked Trump's lawyers whether quid pro quos were even illegal, and whether they were standard procedure for conducting foreign policy.
Dershowitz replied that if Trump had multiple motives — including one that benefited him politically — it would still be legal.
"Everybody has mixed motives, and for there to be a constitutional impeachment based on mixed motives would permit almost any president to be impeached," he added, calling it dangerous to "psychoanalyze" Trump to determine his motives.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) then asked House managers about Dershowitz's arguments that quid pro quos are standard operating procedure in foreign policy.
Rep. Adam Schiff (D-NY) said that in every trial, "the question of the defendant's intention or state of mind is always an issue," responding to Dershowitz's argument that Trump should not be psychoanalyzed to determine whether he abused his power.
Schiff also questioned Dershowitz's belief that all quid pro quos were created equal, asserting that that theory would give a president "carte blanche" to act in their personal political interest rather than the national interest.
"The next president of the United States can ask for an investigation of you. They can ask for help in their next election from any foreign power," Schiff said.
Senators began the first of two planned days of posing questions to both Trump's legal team and the House Democrats who have served as prosecutors in the trial on charges of abusing power and obstructing Congress arising from his request that Ukraine investigate political rival Biden.
The questioning began about 1 p.m. and precedes a vote later in the week on whether to call witnesses as Democrats have sought.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 8:41 PM
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Alan Dershowitz: Democrats can't change that just ....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Alan Dershowitz: Democrats can't change that just ...":
Ex-Congresswoman nails Alan Dershowitz for only considering Clinton impeachment and ignoring the Nixon articles
President Donald Trump's lawyer Alan Dershowitz has been criticized for the past few days as he struggled to justify what many consider terrible legal arguments. In an editorial for the Washington Post Wednesday, former Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman (D-NY) blasted Dershowitz for ignoring the articles in former President Richard Nixon's impeachment.
Holtzman was one of few members of Congress still living who was in the Judiciary Committee when the House began investigating Nixon. She is well acquainted with the law, and even after taking Alan Dershowitz's Harvard Law School class, she still believes he is wrong that an abuse of power is a nothing-burger.
"His assertion flies in the face of the articles of impeachment voted against President Richard M. Nixon by the House Judiciary Committee — of which I was a member — in 1974," she explained. "These articles did not charge Nixon with a crime, a fact Dershowitz willfully ignores. Not one of the three articles adopted by the Judiciary Committee mentioned a criminal statute, charged Nixon with violating any criminal statute or described how his conduct met the standards set forth in any criminal statute."
She wasn't surprised to see Dershowitz trying to ignore the percent set by the Nixon case, because it "demolishes his argument that a president may be impeached only for a criminal act."
ershowitz, she said, simply pretended it didn't exist.
"Even today, the Nixon precedent remains valid and powerful," Holtzman wrote. "The first article of impeachment our committee adopted against Nixon charged him with a variety of acts to "delay, impede and obstruct" the investigation into the 1972 break-in at Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate hotel. This article did not reference the obstruction-of-justice statute or claim that Nixon's actions violated that or any other statute."
She explained that the Judiciary Committee's report doesn't demand proof for criminal acts by the president. It says, "it would be anomalous for the framers . . . to restrict the grounds for impeachment to conduct that was criminal."
But, Dershowitz ignored it.
Holtzman explained that in the Nixon case, impeachment Articles II and III were even more important.
"The second was actually dubbed the 'abuse of power' article by committee members at the time," she explained. "It won the most votes from Republicans on the committee. It, too, did not reference any criminal statute. Instead, it framed Nixon's acts in covering up the break-in as an abuse of power. This article essentially charged Nixon with misusing the powers of his office to hide from law enforcement and Congress the involvement of his campaign and top aides in the Watergate break-in in an effort to win reelection — a matter that was not intended for the benefit of the American people but for Nixon's personal gain."
She said that the coverup did actually work and helped get Nixon reelected in an overwhelming landslide.
In the second article, there was a non-Watergate related piece that involved Nixon's abuse of power: it was about the president trying to get IRS audits of his political rivals. Another was about Nixon authorizing his people to dangle pardons for the Watergate burglars to keep them from talking. These weren't considered crimes, according to the committee, but they were impeachable acts.
Holtzman closed by quoting her committee's 1976 report: "Criminal standards and criminal courts were established to control individual conduct. Impeachment was evolved to cope with both the inadequacy of criminal standards and the impotence of courts to deal with the conduct of great public figures."
She told the Senate not to fall into Dershowitz's false arguments.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 8:38 PM
Ex-Congresswoman nails Alan Dershowitz for only considering Clinton impeachment and ignoring the Nixon articles
President Donald Trump's lawyer Alan Dershowitz has been criticized for the past few days as he struggled to justify what many consider terrible legal arguments. In an editorial for the Washington Post Wednesday, former Rep. Elizabeth Holtzman (D-NY) blasted Dershowitz for ignoring the articles in former President Richard Nixon's impeachment.
Holtzman was one of few members of Congress still living who was in the Judiciary Committee when the House began investigating Nixon. She is well acquainted with the law, and even after taking Alan Dershowitz's Harvard Law School class, she still believes he is wrong that an abuse of power is a nothing-burger.
"His assertion flies in the face of the articles of impeachment voted against President Richard M. Nixon by the House Judiciary Committee — of which I was a member — in 1974," she explained. "These articles did not charge Nixon with a crime, a fact Dershowitz willfully ignores. Not one of the three articles adopted by the Judiciary Committee mentioned a criminal statute, charged Nixon with violating any criminal statute or described how his conduct met the standards set forth in any criminal statute."
She wasn't surprised to see Dershowitz trying to ignore the percent set by the Nixon case, because it "demolishes his argument that a president may be impeached only for a criminal act."
ershowitz, she said, simply pretended it didn't exist.
"Even today, the Nixon precedent remains valid and powerful," Holtzman wrote. "The first article of impeachment our committee adopted against Nixon charged him with a variety of acts to "delay, impede and obstruct" the investigation into the 1972 break-in at Democratic National Committee headquarters at the Watergate hotel. This article did not reference the obstruction-of-justice statute or claim that Nixon's actions violated that or any other statute."
She explained that the Judiciary Committee's report doesn't demand proof for criminal acts by the president. It says, "it would be anomalous for the framers . . . to restrict the grounds for impeachment to conduct that was criminal."
But, Dershowitz ignored it.
Holtzman explained that in the Nixon case, impeachment Articles II and III were even more important.
"The second was actually dubbed the 'abuse of power' article by committee members at the time," she explained. "It won the most votes from Republicans on the committee. It, too, did not reference any criminal statute. Instead, it framed Nixon's acts in covering up the break-in as an abuse of power. This article essentially charged Nixon with misusing the powers of his office to hide from law enforcement and Congress the involvement of his campaign and top aides in the Watergate break-in in an effort to win reelection — a matter that was not intended for the benefit of the American people but for Nixon's personal gain."
She said that the coverup did actually work and helped get Nixon reelected in an overwhelming landslide.
In the second article, there was a non-Watergate related piece that involved Nixon's abuse of power: it was about the president trying to get IRS audits of his political rivals. Another was about Nixon authorizing his people to dangle pardons for the Watergate burglars to keep them from talking. These weren't considered crimes, according to the committee, but they were impeachable acts.
Holtzman closed by quoting her committee's 1976 report: "Criminal standards and criminal courts were established to control individual conduct. Impeachment was evolved to cope with both the inadequacy of criminal standards and the impotence of courts to deal with the conduct of great public figures."
She told the Senate not to fall into Dershowitz's false arguments.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 8:38 PM
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Don Lemon received intense backlash for mocking Tr....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Don Lemon received intense backlash for mocking Tr...":
In July, Trump criticized the TV host in a series of tweets after Lemon asked a question during a Democratic debate that described Trump as bigoted.
"What do you say to those Trump voters who prioritize the economy over the president's bigotry?" Lemon asked Sen. Amy Klobuchar.
"CNN's Don Lemon, the dumbest man on television, insinuated last night while asking a debate 'question' that I was a racist, when in fact I am 'the least racist person in the world.' Perhaps someone should explain to Don that he is supposed to be neutral, unbiased & fair,....." he tweeted.
In a follow-up tweet, Trump continued, "....or is he too dumb (stupid} to understand that. No wonder CNN's ratings (MSNBC's also) have gone down the tubes – and will stay there until they bring credibility back to the newsroom. Don't hold your breath!"
In May, Trump mocked CNN's Chris Cuomo for "record low" ratings and labeled Lemon "the dumbest man on television."
"Wow! CNN Ratings are WAY DOWN, record lows. People are getting tired of so many Fake Stories and Anti-Trump lies. Chris Cuomo was rewarded for lowest morning ratings with a prime time spot - which is failing badly and not helping the dumbest man on television, Don Lemon!" Trump tweeted.
And in August 2018, Trump called NBA star LeBron James and Lemon dumb after James criticized the president in an interview with Lemon on CNN.
"Lebron James was just interviewed by the dumbest man on television, Don Lemon," Trump tweeted. "He made Lebron look smart, which isn't easy to do. I like Mike!"
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 6:41 AM
In July, Trump criticized the TV host in a series of tweets after Lemon asked a question during a Democratic debate that described Trump as bigoted.
"What do you say to those Trump voters who prioritize the economy over the president's bigotry?" Lemon asked Sen. Amy Klobuchar.
"CNN's Don Lemon, the dumbest man on television, insinuated last night while asking a debate 'question' that I was a racist, when in fact I am 'the least racist person in the world.' Perhaps someone should explain to Don that he is supposed to be neutral, unbiased & fair,....." he tweeted.
In a follow-up tweet, Trump continued, "....or is he too dumb (stupid} to understand that. No wonder CNN's ratings (MSNBC's also) have gone down the tubes – and will stay there until they bring credibility back to the newsroom. Don't hold your breath!"
In May, Trump mocked CNN's Chris Cuomo for "record low" ratings and labeled Lemon "the dumbest man on television."
"Wow! CNN Ratings are WAY DOWN, record lows. People are getting tired of so many Fake Stories and Anti-Trump lies. Chris Cuomo was rewarded for lowest morning ratings with a prime time spot - which is failing badly and not helping the dumbest man on television, Don Lemon!" Trump tweeted.
And in August 2018, Trump called NBA star LeBron James and Lemon dumb after James criticized the president in an interview with Lemon on CNN.
"Lebron James was just interviewed by the dumbest man on television, Don Lemon," Trump tweeted. "He made Lebron look smart, which isn't easy to do. I like Mike!"
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 6:41 AM
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Don Lemon received intense backlash for mocking Tr....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Don Lemon received intense backlash for mocking Tr...":
Don Lemon clarifies remarks after President Trump called him the 'dumbest man on television'
Don Lemon is setting the record straight on a CNN clip that angered President Donald Trump.
The clip shows Lemon and two guests weighing in on Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and NPR host Mary Louise Kelly's Ukraine discussion. The anchor called Pompeo's suggestion that Kelly couldn't find the country on a map a "petty attempt to put her down."
Author Rick Wilson concurred: "He also knows, deep in his heart, that Donald Trump couldn't find Ukraine on a map if you had the letter 'U' and a picture of an actual, physical crane," he said. "He knows that this is an administration defined by ignorance of the world. So that's partly him playing to their base and playing to their audience: the credulous boomer rube demo."
Wilson and fellow guest Wajahat Ali, a New York Times and CNN contributor, traded quips in Southern accents, pretending to be Trump supporters slamming "you elitists with your geography and your maps and your spelling," Ali joked.
"Your math and your readin'," Wilson added. Lemon laughed and wiped tears from his eyes.
"Sorry, hold on, wait," the host interjected through chuckles. "Give me a second, hold on. That was good, sorry. That was a good one. I needed that."
Trump responded Tuesday to the clip, dubbing Lemon "the dumbest man on television (with terrible ratings!)."
His daughter Ivanka chimed in, slamming the "arrogance, mocking accents and smug ridicule of this nation's 'Real Elites.' "
"You consistently make fun of half the country and then complain that it is divided," she said.
At the start of Tuesday's episode of "CNN Tonight With Don Lemon," the TV anchor clarified that he wasn't mocking Trump's conservative supporters, merely laughing at a joke.
"During an interview on Saturday night, one of my guests said something that made me laugh" he said. "And while in the moment I found that joke humorous, I didn't catch everything that was said. Just to make this perfectly clear, I was laughing at the joke and not at any group of people."
Lemon added that he doesn't "believe in belittling people, belittling anyone … for who they are, what they believe or where they're from" despite political differences.
"It's personally important for me to address this," Lemon said.
Lemon wasn't the only one who caught flak for the clip.
Ali, who was featured in the video, tweeted Tuesday that his friends were "concerned about my safety" after the president shared the clip.
"I refuse to be intimidated and bullied by bad faith actors who cry fake victimhood, whining about a harmless, silly 30 second clip while endorsing Trump, a cruel vulgarian who debases everyone," he wrote.
Wilson didn't mince words either: He slammed the "fake outrage" surrounding the clip, claiming "the MAGA world wants the freedom to attack, insult, demean, and abuse anyone who doesn't aggressively worship Donald Trump."
"They can't stand anyone who punches back, and hope they can intimidate or shame me," he said.
This isn't the first time the president has referred to Lemon as "the dumbest man on television" or referred to his show's ratings to insult him.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 6:40 AM
Don Lemon clarifies remarks after President Trump called him the 'dumbest man on television'
Don Lemon is setting the record straight on a CNN clip that angered President Donald Trump.
The clip shows Lemon and two guests weighing in on Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and NPR host Mary Louise Kelly's Ukraine discussion. The anchor called Pompeo's suggestion that Kelly couldn't find the country on a map a "petty attempt to put her down."
Author Rick Wilson concurred: "He also knows, deep in his heart, that Donald Trump couldn't find Ukraine on a map if you had the letter 'U' and a picture of an actual, physical crane," he said. "He knows that this is an administration defined by ignorance of the world. So that's partly him playing to their base and playing to their audience: the credulous boomer rube demo."
Wilson and fellow guest Wajahat Ali, a New York Times and CNN contributor, traded quips in Southern accents, pretending to be Trump supporters slamming "you elitists with your geography and your maps and your spelling," Ali joked.
"Your math and your readin'," Wilson added. Lemon laughed and wiped tears from his eyes.
"Sorry, hold on, wait," the host interjected through chuckles. "Give me a second, hold on. That was good, sorry. That was a good one. I needed that."
Trump responded Tuesday to the clip, dubbing Lemon "the dumbest man on television (with terrible ratings!)."
His daughter Ivanka chimed in, slamming the "arrogance, mocking accents and smug ridicule of this nation's 'Real Elites.' "
"You consistently make fun of half the country and then complain that it is divided," she said.
At the start of Tuesday's episode of "CNN Tonight With Don Lemon," the TV anchor clarified that he wasn't mocking Trump's conservative supporters, merely laughing at a joke.
"During an interview on Saturday night, one of my guests said something that made me laugh" he said. "And while in the moment I found that joke humorous, I didn't catch everything that was said. Just to make this perfectly clear, I was laughing at the joke and not at any group of people."
Lemon added that he doesn't "believe in belittling people, belittling anyone … for who they are, what they believe or where they're from" despite political differences.
"It's personally important for me to address this," Lemon said.
Lemon wasn't the only one who caught flak for the clip.
Ali, who was featured in the video, tweeted Tuesday that his friends were "concerned about my safety" after the president shared the clip.
"I refuse to be intimidated and bullied by bad faith actors who cry fake victimhood, whining about a harmless, silly 30 second clip while endorsing Trump, a cruel vulgarian who debases everyone," he wrote.
Wilson didn't mince words either: He slammed the "fake outrage" surrounding the clip, claiming "the MAGA world wants the freedom to attack, insult, demean, and abuse anyone who doesn't aggressively worship Donald Trump."
"They can't stand anyone who punches back, and hope they can intimidate or shame me," he said.
This isn't the first time the president has referred to Lemon as "the dumbest man on television" or referred to his show's ratings to insult him.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 6:40 AM
[Erin Burnett] New comment on Don Lemon received intense backlash for mocking Tr....
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Don Lemon received intense backlash for mocking Tr...":
CNN's Don Lemon explains handling of segment after Trump criticism
CNN anchor Don Lemon on Tuesday night addressed a segment from the weekend that drew criticism from President Trump in which the host laughed after a guest mocked supporters of the president.
"Ask anyone who knows me," Lemon said at the end of his show Tuesday while addressing the segment. "They'll tell you: I don't believe in belittling people ... for who they are, for what they believe or where they're from."
Lemon said that while he found the "joke" from the guest to be funny at the time, he "didn't catch everything that was said."
"I was laughing at the joke and not at any group of people," he concluded.
During a segment on Saturday, Lemon had a panel discussion with GOP strategist Rick Wilson and New York Times columnist and CNN contributor Wajahat Ali. Both Wilson and Ali have been staunch critics of Trump during his presidency.
Lemon laughed after Wilson said, "Trump couldn't find Ukraine on a map if you had the letter 'U' and a picture of an actual physical crane next to it."
Wilson kept going, calling Trump supporters "the credulous boomer rube demo."
The interaction drew the ire of Trump, who retweeted the segment early Tuesday morning, adding, "Don Lemon, the dumbest man on television (with terrible ratings!)."
Others on social media also criticized the segment, including former CNN senior digital producer Steve Krakauer.
"If Donald Trump wins re-election this year, I'll remember this brief CNN segment late one Saturday night in January as the perfect encapsulation for why it happened," he tweeted.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 6:35 AM
CNN's Don Lemon explains handling of segment after Trump criticism
CNN anchor Don Lemon on Tuesday night addressed a segment from the weekend that drew criticism from President Trump in which the host laughed after a guest mocked supporters of the president.
"Ask anyone who knows me," Lemon said at the end of his show Tuesday while addressing the segment. "They'll tell you: I don't believe in belittling people ... for who they are, for what they believe or where they're from."
Lemon said that while he found the "joke" from the guest to be funny at the time, he "didn't catch everything that was said."
"I was laughing at the joke and not at any group of people," he concluded.
During a segment on Saturday, Lemon had a panel discussion with GOP strategist Rick Wilson and New York Times columnist and CNN contributor Wajahat Ali. Both Wilson and Ali have been staunch critics of Trump during his presidency.
Lemon laughed after Wilson said, "Trump couldn't find Ukraine on a map if you had the letter 'U' and a picture of an actual physical crane next to it."
Wilson kept going, calling Trump supporters "the credulous boomer rube demo."
The interaction drew the ire of Trump, who retweeted the segment early Tuesday morning, adding, "Don Lemon, the dumbest man on television (with terrible ratings!)."
Others on social media also criticized the segment, including former CNN senior digital producer Steve Krakauer.
"If Donald Trump wins re-election this year, I'll remember this brief CNN segment late one Saturday night in January as the perfect encapsulation for why it happened," he tweeted.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Erin Burnett at January 29, 2020 at 6:35 AM
Dogecoin to Dollar Conversion and Cashout Doge Coin
If you are a crypto trader or investor and want to get all cryptocurrency dogecoin news we are here for you. Cryptographic money is much the same as an advanced state of cash that utilizations cryptography for its security. This specific security makes cryptographic money something hard to fake. Numerous digital forms of money work on decentralized frameworks. They chip away at blockchain innovation, much the same as an appropriated record. The crypto clients presently can purchase, sell, exchange, move and trade dogecoin or numerous coins and cashout dogecoin on this stage. Let us take the case of Bitcoin to comprehend it in detail. Bitcoin was the first blockchain-based cryptographic money, and it is as yet the most well known as dogecoin to dollar conversion. The clients respect it in high regard. Because of its constant notoriety, different trades appeared with their numerous capacities or determinations. Some of them are copies of Bitcoin, while others are 'forks,' which are a particular kind of digital forms of money that split from one that as of now exists. Crypto trades are likewise connected like sites where you can cashout dogecoin, buy, sell, or trade dogecoin for other advanced types of money or even customary cash, similar to US Dollars or Euro. For those of you who might want to exchange expertly and you just so happen to approach grade-An apparatuses and dogecoin currency exchange, it is an astute plan to utilize a trade that expects you to approve your ID and open a record. Presently for those of you who might like to make intermittent and progressively essential exchanges, there are stages accessible for you to utilize that don't require a record. Before utilizing any cashout dogecoin stage, you should search for some fundamental highlights like topographical limitations, exchange expenses, security, convenience, and the believability of the regarded trade. The vast majority of the dogecoin changing out charge commissions and expenses for their administrations as we realize that nobody likes to get over-charged. You can also sell dogecoin Malaysia using Paypal or any other account online here. Following through on the most minimal costs is constantly significant. A few exchanges are straightforward about the amount you will pay to store, purchase, sell, store, and pull back. Installment techniques are additionally one of the fundamental highlights of a decent trade. These are the techniques that impact the positioning of a trade. Essentially on the grounds that when clients have chosen to confide in a specific spot, they will in general adhere to a similar site. On the off chance that there are insufficient choices, at that point clients need to know how to sell dogecoin for cash and look into elective destinations – and this requires significant investment. There are four most-utilized installment techniques, including bank move, Visa/Mastercard, PayPal, Cash, WesternUnion, p2p meetups, Payoneer, and different mediums. There is no deficiency of potential trade stages that are accessible for use, however it is astute to comprehend the advantages and disadvantages of each before focusing on one. Bitcoinsxchanger is the most secure stage to purchase, sell, exchange, trade and cashout dogecoin with complete certainty. Since, this is secure and most dependable approach to It goes to considerable lengths to encourage its clients the most developed and cutting-edge benefits all around. Since it's a magnificent stage that can finish your exchange like a flash and you won't need to confront any issues here. Our trade approaches are extremely severe. So you can undoubtedly cash out doge coin without stress.
Trusted Dogecoin Exchange and Check Dogecoin Value Chart
When considering purchasing, selling or trusted dogecoin exchange, your own thought is required by digital currency traders. There are many fascinating focuses when stacking Doge. Consistent quest for less requesting or less expensive ways to deal with gather Dogecoins. You can choose to keep your money in your budgetary equalization or PayPal. Also, center around the timeframe, for instance, the time it takes to get cash and the money expected to change Dogecoin. These are a portion of the inquiries to pose. Bitcoinsxchanger is additionally the definitive advance to offer an ideal response to every one of these inquiries. This is the fundamental site where you can get currency exchange rate USD to dogecoin esteem desires for future interests. Something else, the issue of changing Dogecoin to BTC or an alternate money design is sufficiently long and now some light is developing towards the finish of the entry. More players will join the business and experience the way toward changing over advanced cash into disparity.
For instance, progressed multifunctional electronic installment structures, for example, Bitcoinsxchanger and different strategies, for example, cryptographic money exchanging have demonstrated that mechanized money can at last adjust to standard conveyances. Remember that the risk section is yet to come. So also, you can begin mining here. On the off chance, Doge to PM exchange that you move to different locales before beginning the Dogecoin mining gathering, you ought to think about how the gathering checks prizes for people, bunch security and hash quality for various areas. That might be the situation, for instance, standard business controls, for example, Bitcoinsxchanger, continually endeavor to give rewarding business controls to their clients.
You might be thinking about a way to deal with changing over Dogecoin into cash, however remember that every one of the strategies that exist in crypto publicizing are consolidated. This implies there is constantly a general peril, in spite of the fact that everything must be changed to cash and transfer dogecoin to bitcoin wallet. As indicated by these arrangements, on the off chance that you change a Dogecoin of $ at least 1 to US dollars in the digital money exchanging stage, you should play securely. Utilize a wallet to secure Bitcoin reliably in refrigerated stockpiling. Bitcoinsxchanger is a setup to quickly and safely change Bitcoin to US dollars. Ensured total insider facts and coin security.
Changing Dogecoin to perfect money isn't a simple alternative. Some think of it as their encryption organization, the last token of the last game. Others consider it to be a "square" benefit approach, liberating the cerebrum from the worth theory. You can check here dogecoin value chart before investing in dogecoin. Whatever the clarification behind the heap, there are a few focal points. Whether or not the dogecoin gauge increments or diminishes because of the dogecoin guarantee, the FIAT capital gauge doesn't change. Likewise, you can utilize this site to purchase dogecoin on PayPal. Lessens the chance to confirm tops in the outlines, bringing about time venture reserves. Moreover, you can utilize capital where you need it.
In all actuality in the event that you have bitcoin, you can do as such without critical changes to change over to USD. You can reclaim them for cash and recoup resources in the exchange Dogecoin to MasterCard related with your PayPal account. Bitcoinsxchanger is a simple to-utilize arrange that permits you to send DOGE to PayPal in a simple and profitable manner. At this stage, great business controls, for example, DOGE, XRP and XRM are suggested. Essentially, the PayPal Association is making it progressively appropriate for encryption administrators. Also, enrolling at this phase of dogecoin exchanging gives you the sentiment of supreme harmony when you trade money or trade for significant installment stages.
Convert Dogecoin to MG - Dogecoin to USD Chart
When considering buying or selling dogecoin, your own consideration is required by cryptocurrency merchants. You must check dogecoin to usd chart. There are many interesting points when loading Doge. Continuous search for less demanding or cheaper approaches to collect Dogecoins. You can decide to keep your cash in your financial balance or PayPal. Similarly, focus on the period of time, for example, the time it takes to get money and the cash needed to change Dogecoin. These are some of the questions to ask. Bitcoinsxchanger is also the decisive step to give a perfect answer to all these questions. This is the main site where you can get Dogecoin value expectations for future interests. Another thing, the problem of changing Dogecoin to PKR converter or a different currency format is long enough and now some light is emerging towards the end of the passage. More players will join the business and go through the process of converting digital money into inequality. For example, advanced multifunctional electronic payment frameworks such as Bitcoinsxchanger and various techniques such as cryptocurrency trading have shown that computerized cash can ultimately conform to standard deliveries. Keep in mind that the danger segment is yet to come. Similarly, you can start mining here. If you move to other sites before starting the Dogecoin mining group, you should consider how to check dogecoin exchange rate and the group verifies rewards for individuals, group security and hash strength for different locations. That may be the case, for example, standard business controls, such as Bitcoinsxchanger, constantly strive to provide lucrative business controls to their customers. You may be thinking of an approach to converting Dogecoin into money, but keep in mind that all the techniques that exist in crypto advertising are combined. This means that there is always a general danger, although everything must be changed to money. According to these policies, if you change a Dogecoin of $ 1 or more to US dollars in the cryptocurrency trading stage and cryptocurrency exchange dogecoin, you must play safely. Use a wallet to protect Bitcoin consistently in refrigerated storage. Bitcoinsxchanger is a configuration to instantly and securely change Bitcoin to US dollars. Guaranteed complete secrets and coin security. Changing Dogecoin to ideal cash is not an easy option. Some consider it their encryption company, the last reminder of the last game. Others see it as a "square" profit approach, freeing the brain from the value hypothesis. Whatever the explanation behind the load, there are some advantages. Regardless of whether the dogecoin estimate increases or decreases as a result of the dogecoin claim, the FIAT capital estimate does not change. Exchange dogecoin for litecoin, this services is also available at this site. Similarly, you can use this site to buy dogecoin on PayPal. Reduces the opportunity to verify peaks in the illustrations, resulting in time investment funds. In addition, you can use capital where you need it. The truth is that if you have bitcoin, you can do so without significant changes to convert to USD. You can redeem them for money and recover assets in the MasterCard associated with your PayPal account. Bitcoinsxchanger is an easy-to-use stage that allows you to send DOGE to PayPal in an easy and advantageous way. At this stage, converting doge coin to MG, good commercial controls such as DOGE, XRP and XRM are recommended. Similarly, the PayPal Association is making it increasingly suitable for encryption operators. Secondly, registering at this stage of dogecoin trading gives you the feeling of absolute peace when you exchange cash or exchange for important payment stages.
How to Transfer Doge coin to Bank Account
If you are thinking about exchanging, buying or selling dogecoin. First, check our dogecoin price history because we are dealing world's largest cryptocurrency market place. Something else, the issue of changing over Dogecoin or different monetary forms has been long enough, and now some light is showing up toward the finish of the passage. More players are joining the business to make the digital money to disparity transformation procedure, and the other way around, quick, immediate and solid. A few techniques, for example, progressed multifunctional electronic installment frameworks and cryptographic money trades, for example, Bitcoinsxchanger, show that computerized cash can eventually be coordinated into standard installments. By and by, perceive that the hazard segment is as yet coming. This site is best exchange for dogecoin. You can likewise begin mining here and before beginning dogecoin mining pool, in the event that you go on other site, you should think about different locales how the pool ascertains the compensation for its individuals, how secure the pool is and the hashing intensity of the pool. Be that as it may, standard trade administrations, for example, Bitcoinsxchanger consistently endeavor to give advantageous trade administrations to clients.
On the off chance that you are thinking about approaches to change over dogecoin to money, remember that every one of the techniques that exist in the crypto advertise are brought together. Buy dogecoin with debit card is one of the best part of this site. This implies there is constantly a general hazard in the event that you despite everything need to change over to money. Along these lines, you should play it safe when changing over dogecoin to American on a cryptographic money trade stage. Utilize a wallet to guard your Bitcoin consistently in refrigerated stockpiling. Bitcoinsxchanger is a confided set up to change over bitcoins to US dollars right away and safely. Assurance complete secrecy and coin security.
Changing Dogecoin for the ideal cash isn't a simple choice. Some consider it to be his crypto venture, how to transfer dogecoin to bank account, get full information about this on litecoins exchanger site. Others think of it as an approach to "square" benefits and free the brain from value hypothesis. Whatever the explanation behind charging, there are a few advantages. In the wake of asserting dogecoin, regardless of whether the estimation of dogecoin increments or diminishes, the FIAT estimation of the capital doesn't change. You can likewise purchase dogecoin with paypal utilizing this site. Lessens an opportunity to check for spikes in illustrations, bringing about time investment funds. Furthermore, you can utilize the capital any place you need.
Truth be told, in the event that you can dogecoin exchange USD, you can without much of a stretch change doge to usd convert. You can trade them for money and pull back assets to a Mastercard associated with your PayPal account. Bitcoinsxchanger is a simple to-utilize stage that can send DOGE to PayPal in a simple and advantageous manner. This stage encourages brilliant trade administrations, for example, DOGE, XRP, XRM. Likewise, PayPal association makes it increasingly appropriate for crypto shippers. Second, enrolling on this dogecoin trade stage gives you genuine feelings of serenity when you trade cash or trade for your principle installment stage. If, you want to earn more and more and finding no best way, then come and join us and invest dogecoin for US dollars and see the magic, you will be rich very soon.
What is dogecoin and How to buy Dogecoin
There are many people who do not know about what is dogecoin. Doegcoin is a cryptocurrency, in the beginning it was taken asa a joke. But now it is very famous and popular coin. When you think about ways to withdraw dogecoin, you need special attention from cryptocurrency merchants. They will have to consider many things to consider when charging Doge. Always look for the easiest method or the cheapest method to collect dogecoin. You can choose to deposit your money in your bank account or PayPal. Also, pay attention to the time frame, such as how long it would take to receive your cash and in what currency you need to change your dogecoin. How to buy dogecoin, it is very simple and easy now with this dogecoin exchanger site. These are some of the questions to ask. And Bitcoinsxchanger is the ultimate platform to provide you with an ideal solution for all these queries.
Actually, the problem of converting dogecoin to bitcoin or other currencies has persisted for long enough, now some light is evident at the end of the tunnel. More players are joining the industry to help make the cryptocurrency to fiat conversion process or vice versa fast, direct and reliable. There is very simple method to buy, sell, exchange, trade or transfer doge coin cryptocurrency, you need a doge coin wallet and you can get it on this site for free.
Some methods, such as advanced multifunctional electronic payment systems and cryptocurrency converter exchangers such as Bitcoinsxchanger, have shown that it is finally possible to integrate digital currencies into standard payments. Despite this, it is important to appreciate that the element of risk is still coming. But standard exchange services such as Bitcoinsxchanger always strive to provide convenient exchange services to their customers.
If you are thinking of ways to convert dogecoin into cash, keep in mind that all the methods present in the encryption market are centralized. This is question where to buy dogecoin safe and securely. Our website is best website in the world because of its privacy policies and you can buy dogecoin anytime from anywhere in the world instantly. This means that there is always a prevailing risk when you want to convert to cash yet. Therefore, you should take all precautions when converting dogecoin to USD on cryptocurrency exchange platforms. Always keep your bitcoins safe in cold storage using wallets. Bitcoinsxchanger is a reliable place to convert bitcoins to USD instantly and safely. It guarantees complete anonymity and the security of your coins. There is another option available to start investing in doge is dogecoin mining software. With the help of this you can start mining and investing and can easily trade your dogecoin.
Changing dogecoin for perfect money is not an easy decision to make. Some see it as the ultimatum of his crypto journey, the final game. Others see it as a way to "block" their profits and free their minds from price speculation. Whatever your reason for charging, there may be several benefits. After charging your dogecoin, the FIAT value of your capital will remain the same, whether dogecoin increases or decreases its value. You will spend less time reviewing the sudden increases and falls of the graphics, saving time as a result. In addition dogecoin to USD transfer, you can use your capital where you prefer.
In fact, if you own Bitcoins, you can easily change doge to usd convert. You can exchange them for fiat money and withdraw funds to your credit card, which is connected to the PayPal account. Bitcoinsxchanger is an easy to use platform where you can send your DOGE to PayPal in an easy and convenient way. This platform facilitates excellent exchange services for DOGE, XRP and XRM, etc. Also with its PayPal connectivity it makes it more suitable for crypto merchants. Then, by registering on this platform, you can feel easy when exchanging cryptocurrency online and also to the main payment platforms.
How to cash out Dogecoin to US dollar
When you think about the ways how to cash out dogecoin to US dollar, it needs special attention from crypto traders. They will have to consider many things to consider when cashing out Doge. Always look for the easiest method or the cheapest method for cashing out dogecoin. You can go for the option of depositing your money into your bank account or PayPal. Also, you pay attention to the time frame like how much time would it take to receive your cash and in which currency you need to exchange your dogecoin These are some of the questions that you will need to ask yourself. And Bitcoinsxchanger is the ultimate platform to provide you an ideal solution for all these queries.
Actually the issue to convert dogecoin to bitcoin or other currencies has persisted for long enough, some light at the end of the tunnel is now evident. More players are joining the industry to help make the process of converting crypto coins to fiat or vice versa prompt, direct, and reliable.
A few methods such as advanced multi-functional electronic payment systems and cryptocurrency converters exchanges like Bitcoinsxchanger have demonstrated that it is possible to finally integrate the digital coins into the standard payments. Despite this, it is important to appreciate that the element of risk still looms. But the standard exchange services like Bitcoinsxchanger always takes pains to provide convenient exchange services to its customers.
If you are thinking about the ways of turn dogecoin into cash then keep one thing in mind that all the methods present in the crypto market are centralized. This means that there is always a risk prevailing when you want to turn into cash are still. Therefore, you should take every precaution when you turn dogecoin to USD on the cryptocurrency exchange platforms. Always keep your bitcoins safe in cold storage by using wallets. Bitcoinsxchanger is a reliable place to turn bitcoins to USD in an instant and safe way. It assures you complete anonymity and security of your coins.
Exchange dogecoin to perfect money is not an easy decision to make. Some see it as the ultimatum of their crypto journey, the end game. Others see it as a way to "lock" their profits and free their minds from price speculation. Whatever your reason for cashing out maybe, there are several benefits that come with it. After cashing out your dogecoin, the FIAT value of your capital will remain the same, whether dogecoin increases or decreases in value. You will spend less time checking the surges and plunges off the charts, saving time as a result. Also, you will be able to use your capital wherever you prefer.
In fact, if you possess Bitcoins, you can easily exchange doge to USD convert. You can exchange them into fiat money and withdraw funds to your credit card, which is connected to the PayPal account. Bitcoinsxchanger is a user-friendly platform where you can send your DOGE to PayPal in an easy and convenient way. This platform facilitates excellent exchange services for DOGE, XRP, and XRM, etc. Also with its connectivity with PayPal makes it more suitable for crypto traders. So by signing up at this platform you can feel ease in exchanging any coin and also to leading payment platforms.
Sunday, January 26, 2020
[Học Để Thi] New comment on Clip Nôi Tiếng "Ăn Chuối Anh Ơi".
Erin Burnett has left a new comment on your post "Clip Nôi Tiếng "Ăn Chuối Anh Ơi"":
Phim nó truyền tải được nhiều thứ, chứ k phải cái nhìn nhận đơn giản về nội dung hay là do cái cốt truyện - tạo phim mà người ta dẫn dắt mà đánh giá + chê bai 1 góc nhỏ mà ai cũng như ai đều biết cả rồi đấy. Dù cốt chuyện hay nội dung dẫn dắt thiên về 1 hướng nhưng những nhân vật sống trong thế giới đấy chẳng có ai chính chẳng có ai phụ cả, tất cả đều là chính trong thế giới sinh tồn,những nhân vật trong phim ở mọi vùng đất ai cũng giỏi, từ người lính đến người hầu, họ đều làm tốt khả năng cuộc sống và vị trí của mình, người chết oan, người tưởng chừng làm điều vô bổ...Vấn đề ở đây là thế giới kiểu " Người nhìn thấy và không nhìn thấy". Nếu đem so sánh cs của con người trên trái đất này tổng hợp lại mình ở góc độ nào, sự nhìn nhận, quyết định ra sao, sự thực tế nó thế nào, trong phim cũng truyền tải rồi đấy, cái đó dẫn đến cái tư duy tiềm thức hướng đến những thứ chung là đồng cảm. Tôi đang ở đây, nhìn thấy cái thứ bạn k thấy! Nếu để được diễn giải thì tôi còn có thể nói nhiều lắm nhưng ngôn từ và sự diễn đạt của tôi có hạn đối với suy nghĩ k thể nói thêm lại thành dài dòng quá mức sự hiểu.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Học Để Thi at January 27, 2020 at 4:00 AM
Phim nó truyền tải được nhiều thứ, chứ k phải cái nhìn nhận đơn giản về nội dung hay là do cái cốt truyện - tạo phim mà người ta dẫn dắt mà đánh giá + chê bai 1 góc nhỏ mà ai cũng như ai đều biết cả rồi đấy. Dù cốt chuyện hay nội dung dẫn dắt thiên về 1 hướng nhưng những nhân vật sống trong thế giới đấy chẳng có ai chính chẳng có ai phụ cả, tất cả đều là chính trong thế giới sinh tồn,những nhân vật trong phim ở mọi vùng đất ai cũng giỏi, từ người lính đến người hầu, họ đều làm tốt khả năng cuộc sống và vị trí của mình, người chết oan, người tưởng chừng làm điều vô bổ...Vấn đề ở đây là thế giới kiểu " Người nhìn thấy và không nhìn thấy". Nếu đem so sánh cs của con người trên trái đất này tổng hợp lại mình ở góc độ nào, sự nhìn nhận, quyết định ra sao, sự thực tế nó thế nào, trong phim cũng truyền tải rồi đấy, cái đó dẫn đến cái tư duy tiềm thức hướng đến những thứ chung là đồng cảm. Tôi đang ở đây, nhìn thấy cái thứ bạn k thấy! Nếu để được diễn giải thì tôi còn có thể nói nhiều lắm nhưng ngôn từ và sự diễn đạt của tôi có hạn đối với suy nghĩ k thể nói thêm lại thành dài dòng quá mức sự hiểu.
Unsubscribe from comment emails for this blog.
Posted by Erin Burnett to Học Để Thi at January 27, 2020 at 4:00 AM
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)